iPod Nano Review – LizRating

Email This Page | Print This Page | Go Back


1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

iPod Nano 2GB_2.gifComprehensive iPod Nano Review

Brand: Apple
Model: Nano 2 GB
Model Year: 2006
Date Purchased: July 2006
Purchaese at: Best Buy
Product Description: 2 GB flash drive music and photo slideshow player, up to 14 hours of music playback, black

Summary:
I’ve enjoyed my iPod Nano since summer 2006 and am still enjoying it to this day. I have not had any problems with it so far. There is no shortage of cool built into this slender, lightweight, sleek looking device. I wanted a player with a flash drive so I wouldn’t have to worry about it getting damaged bouncing around while I work out every day. It’s quick to respond, buttons are easy to use, and the display is bright and easy to see.

LizRating

Each of the following 9 criteria were rated from 1 to 7, where:

    1-1.9 = Product is not competitive in this specific area.
    2-3.9 = Product is somewhat competitive in this specific area, but other products are considerably more competitive. Product needs improvement.
    4-5.9 = Product is competitive, but some products may outperform it. Minor details when it comes to possible improvements.
    6-7 = Product clearly oupterforms the competition in this specific area.

Rating Criteria

  • Aesthetic Appearance: 7
      The iPod Nano looks great, especially in black. I love the sleek look.
  • Robust: 7
      Looks niiiiice! I love the way my sleek black iPod looks.
  • Number of Possible Improvements: 2
      The iPod could be a bit more robust and I would gladly sacrifice adding some weight so I wouldn’t have to worry about breaking it when I put it in my pocket. And of course, the most commonly stated possible improvement for the nano is the battery life. Although I do have to say, my Nano’s battery life hasn’t exactly decreased my quality of life either…I’m pretty impressed that this tiny thing lasts almost 14 hours!
  • Easy/Convenient to use: 6.5
      I absolutely love how the navigation works compared to they typical MP3 player; the iPod is much quicker and easier to navigate. However, it is easy to sometimes accidentally hit buttons before I have a chance to lock it.
  • Pricing Competitiveness: 4
      The iPod Nano is definitely the most expensive per GB, but it’s also the best and can therefore get away with being expensive. I was willing to pay the extra money to get the best and so far it’s been worth it.
  • Brand: 6.8
      Not a big Apple fan, but still really do love the iPod Nano. One thing that stuck out when I bought the Nano was how nice the packaging was. I was really impressed by the neat, clean, and simple packaging. And it must be said that I really appreciate the simple, to the point, easy to understand operating instructions…that’s not too common!
  • Overall Performance: 7
      Performs well, haven’t had any problems to justify a score deduction. I use my Nano every day in the car and sometimes while I’m working and love the fact that I have 100% problem free operation all the time, which could easily be taken for granted. I haven’t run into problems with the battery life, so my only experience with the Nano has been great.
  • Level of Recommendation: 7
      I highly recommend the iPod Nano. It’s small, sleek, reliable, and easy to use.

Based on the ratings of the 8 criteria above the iPod Nano received an overall LizRating of 6.2 out of 7, where:

    1-1.9 = Pick another product: The product is just not competitive in the market. May as well start from scratch.
    2-3.9 = There may be better products out there: somewhat competitive, but missing a major aspect of the performance or functionality or are outperformed by the competition severely in an area of performance or functionality. Product needs improvement. May have one terrific aspect, but weak in other areas.
    4-5.9 = Recommended: competitive, but may be slightly outperformed by some products in the market in minor aspects.
    6-7 = Highly recommended: outperforms other products in nearly all aspects; down to the nitty gritty on what could be improved.

Other Comments and Suggestions:
The main factor in score deducton for the iPod Nano was the possible improvements: the Nano could be more robust and have better battery life. It appears that Apple has already addressed the first possible improvement by making the 2007 model a bit more robust. I have not had an opportunity to test the battery life yet, but will post the information when I have it.

Was this review helpful? Please let me know how helpful this review is and what I can do better.

Share Is Caring:
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
Go Back


Rate This Article

Leave a Reply